# Analysis result
## Run metadata
Analyst model: GPT-5, per system context. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools/external data: not used; dossier-only analysis.

## Machine-readable result
```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5",
  "case_id": "CASE-Q2R9",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: candidate pickup begins on A, then resolves into D with D bass and D-major figuration. Inference: home tonic is substantially secured, though not literally on the candidate onset."},
    "thematic_correspondence": {"score": 4, "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E016", "E002", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: W3 at onset 3 reproduces the opening upbeat contour, and E017 closely matches E002. Inference: opening-theme return is extensive and specific."},
    "preparation_strength": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015", "E016"], "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate material has sustained altered sonorities and high-register motion but no explicit dominant pedal or clear cadential close. Inference: preparation is rhetorically present but cadentially mixed."},
    "proportional_location": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E016"], "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs 120 quarter notes into a 408-quarter second part. Inference: this early-mid second-part location is compatible with a recapitulatory division, though not decisive alone."},
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: there are no dynamics or barline changes; texture thins to solo line before bass reentry. Inference: arrival is perceptible through texture and register, but not strongly marked."},
    "rotational_continuation": {"score": 4, "evidence_ids": ["E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E021", "E022"], "reason": "Observed: W3 and W4 continue matching opening measures E002-E007 in order. Inference: subsequent behavior strongly supports recapitulation rather than continued sequence."}
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.03,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.12,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.85
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {"level": "none", "confidence": 0.0},
  "case_note": "The candidate is best read as an opening-theme pickup leading into a tonic double return, with tonal arrival slightly delayed past the annotated onset."
}
```

## Limitations
The dossier gives symbolic windows only, with no audio, score image, phrase labels, or broader formal map beyond window excerpts and elapsed duration. Dynamics are mostly absent, limiting rhetorical scoring. The main analytical uncertainty is whether the annotated pickup onset or the following D arrival should define tonal status.