# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: GPT-5  
Provider: unknown  
Settings: unknown  
Tools were available but not used. External data were disallowed and not accessed.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5",
  "case_id": "CASE-6U43",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015", "E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: the candidate begins on home-tonic D and soon outlines D-major pitch content after a B-minor close. Inference: tonic stability is substantial, though the exposed, initially unharmonized onset prevents maximal certainty."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E004", "E005", "E015", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed: E015 duplicates E001 exactly, while E025–E026 duplicate E004–E005. Inference: these exact, extended correspondences strongly establish return of the opening thematic rotation despite intervening alteration."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: a trilled C-sharp resolves to B, followed by a descending B-minor arpeggiation and rests before E015. Inference: this provides substantial cadential and rhetorical preparation, although not a home-dominant preparation."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: E015 begins 63 of 147 quarter-note units into the second part, approximately 42.9 percent. Inference: this is substantially compatible with a recapitulatory division, though proportion alone is not decisive."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: rests thin the texture before the exposed opening D; no dynamic, articulation, or barline accent marks the arrival. Inference: textural contrast gives moderate emphasis, but explicit rhetorical reinforcement is limited."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E004", "E005", "E015", "E021", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed: subsequent arpeggiated material leads to exact returns of opening measures E004–E005 at E025–E026. Inference: the sustained restoration of opening order strongly favors recapitulatory continuation over free development."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.02,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.07,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.91
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "work",
    "confidence": 0.78
  },
  "case_note": "The exact opening-theme restoration, home-tonic onset, and later recovery of additional opening measures make a tonic double return the strongest reading."
}
```

## Limitations

Missing evidence: the dossier provides selected windows rather than the complete movement and supplies no audio or performance realization. Analytical uncertainty remains because the candidate’s onset is unharmonized, follows a B-minor closure, and lacks explicit dynamic or articulatory emphasis; thus its immediate tonic status is less certain than its thematic identity and subsequent rotational function.