# Analysis result

## Run metadata

- Analyst model: GPT-5-based Codex
- Provider: unknown
- Settings: unknown
- Tools: available but prohibited by the access boundary and not used
- External data: unavailable and not used

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5-based Codex",
  "case_id": "CASE-8JQJ",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: E015 begins on B–D-sharp–F-sharp, not home D, while D becomes locally explicit in E017. Inference: home-tonic stability at the candidate onset is minimal, though tonic follows soon."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E003", "E004", "E015", "E016", "E017", "E018"],
      "reason": "Observed: E015 reshapes E001, while E016–E018 closely reproduce E002–E004 in rhythm, melody, and much accompaniment. Inference: an extensive opening-theme return is strongly established despite its altered first measure."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: E014 thins into rests, drops to p, and ends on D/F-sharp before E015 enters f on B major. Inference: rhetorical contrast prepares entry, but cadential or dominant preparation of B is weak."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate metadata places E015 at 72 of 141 quarter notes in the second part, nearly its midpoint. Inference: this is strongly compatible with a development-to-recapitulation division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: E014 shifts to p and a fragmented, resting texture; E015 answers with f, a full low B-major sonority, and renewed upper-line entrance. Inference: the arrival receives substantial emphasis."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017", "E018", "E023", "E024", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed: E016–E018 continue the opening correspondence, but E023–E026 form literal two-measure sequential repetitions. Inference: subsequent behavior is mixed, supporting an initial rotation while also resembling continued development."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.33,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.668,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.002
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "style",
    "confidence": 0.85
  },
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly recalls the opening at an emphatic, proportionally plausible boundary, but begins outside the home tonic and soon diverges into sequential continuation. An off-tonic recapitulation is favored, with a meaningful false-return alternative."
}
```

## Limitations

Missing dossier evidence includes the material between the supplied windows, later exposition themes, and music after E026, preventing a complete rotational comparison or confirmation of a later competing return. Analytical uncertainty concerns whether the rapid move toward D and subsequent sequential repetition represent recapitulatory recomposition or a false return within continued development. Dynamics and articulation are complete but sparse, limiting rhetorical assessment.