# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: unknown. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools or external data: not used; only the embedded dossier was available and considered.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-VT57",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate opens on G-B-D materials, while common tonic is D. Inference: this supports a stable non-home key area, not structural stability of D."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E015", "E016"],
      "reason": "Observed: W3 reproduces W1 rhythms, two-voice texture, and melodic-bass contour transposed. Inference: the opening theme returns extensively and recognizably."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: E014 sustains D-A-C materials before arrival on G at E015. Inference: this is substantial dominant-like preparation for the candidate key, though not for home D."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs 52 qn into a 180 qn second part. Inference: the placement is possible but early and therefore only mixed for a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: regular barline, no dynamics, articulations, or directions; texture resumes opening pattern. Inference: the return is clear thematically but has weak explicit rhetorical marking."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017", "E018", "E019", "E020"],
      "reason": "Observed: W3 continues with material corresponding to opening measures, transposed, through several measures. Inference: behavior substantially resembles recapitulatory rotation rather than mere continuation."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.08,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.82,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.1
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "style",
    "confidence": 0.35
  },
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly returns the opening theme but in G rather than the home tonic D, with local preparation into that off-tonic arrival."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier provides symbolic notes, timing, and markings, but no broader formal map beyond sampled windows and elapsed duration. Dynamics are encoded as complete yet absent here, limiting rhetorical assessment. Tonal conclusions rely on pitch content and local progression only; no external identity, score context, or scholarship was used.