# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: unknown. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools/external data: not used; only the embedded dossier was available.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-8JQJ",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate begins with B-D#-F# and G-A-G, not home D, before D-centered material appears. Inference: home tonic is weak at the return onset."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E015", "E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate reproduces the opening rest-then-three-note gesture and much subsequent melodic material, partly transposed or reharmonized. Inference: opening-theme return is substantial but not literal."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate includes dynamic contrast and approach to the candidate, but no clear home-dominant cadence into D. Inference: preparation is rhetorically present but tonally mixed."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs after 72 of 141 second-part quarter notes. Inference: this near-midpoint placement is compatible with a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate piano is followed by forte at the candidate with renewed opening texture. Inference: the return is marked as an arrival, though barline and texture are not exceptional."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E021", "E022"],
      "reason": "Observed: early continuation recalls opening measures, then diverges into different sequential material. Inference: rotational behavior is plausible but not consistently recapitulatory."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.18,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.72,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.1
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {"level": "none", "confidence": 0.0},
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly recalls the opening theme at a plausible recapitulatory point, but its onset is off tonic and later continuation is mixed."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier gives symbolic windows only, not full movement context or audio. Tonal function before and after the candidate is therefore uncertain, especially because the return is reharmonized and the continuation diverges after a few measures. Recognition played no role beyond the required self-report.