# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: GPT-5-based Codex, per system context. Provider: OpenAI, per system context. Settings: unknown. Tools: available in session but not used. External data: not used and disallowed by task instructions.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5-based Codex",
  "case_id": "CASE-6U43",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate begins on D and soon outlines D/F#/A material. Inference: home tonic is substantially present, though the opening bar lacks full harmonic support."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: E015 matches E001 in pitches, rhythm, register, texture, and rest pattern. Inference: this is a strong opening-theme return."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate material emphasizes B, D, F#, and C# trill before D return. Inference: little clear dominant or cadential preparation into home tonic."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs at 63 of 147 quarter notes through the second part. Inference: this is a plausible recapitulatory location, though somewhat before midpoint."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016"],
      "reason": "Observed: no dynamics, articulations, special barline, or registral expansion mark the candidate. Inference: arrival is rhetorically plain despite thematic clarity."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E021", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed: after the candidate, later continuation recalls opening measures E004-E005 at E025-E026. Inference: behavior substantially supports a returning rotation."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.08,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.04,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.88
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "none",
    "confidence": 0.0
  },
  "case_note": "Candidate strongly returns the opening theme on the home tonic, with weaker preparation and rhetorical emphasis but sufficient continuation to favor tonic double return."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier supplies symbolic events only; it lacks score layout, phrasing marks beyond encoded directions, and broader formal context outside the windows. The main uncertainty is analytical: preparation and rhetoric are weak, while thematic and tonal evidence are strong. No external knowledge or recognition was used.