# Analysis result

Completed independent rubric application using only the embedded dossier.

## Run metadata

Analyst model: GPT-5 Codex, per visible system/developer context. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools were available in the interface but not used. External data/internet were not used; network access was restricted.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5 Codex",
  "case_id": "CASE-DZWT",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017", "E018"],
      "reason": "Observed: W3 opens on D octaves in D-major key signature and repeats tonic-oriented opening events. Inference: the home tonic is structurally stable at the candidate."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E003", "E004", "E015", "E016", "E017", "E018"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate measures duplicate the opening pitches, durations, voicing, and dynamic. Inference: this is a strong opening-theme return."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E012", "E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate material sustains A-C#-G sonority and resolves to D at W3. Inference: dominant preparation is substantial, though not a full explicit cadence."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs 159 quarters into a 390-quarter second part. Inference: location is plausible but somewhat early for a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: dominant sonority and register lead into a fresh p opening statement. Inference: the arrival is rhetorically clear but restrained rather than emphatic."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E019", "E020", "E021", "E022"],
      "reason": "Observed: post-candidate music continues the opening rotation, matching later opening measures. Inference: behavior supports recapitulation rather than continued development."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.03,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.02,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.95
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "style",
    "confidence": 0.35
  },
  "case_note": "The candidate is a tonic double return: D-major tonic, exact opening-theme correspondence, dominant preparation, and rotational continuation outweigh only moderate proportional ambiguity."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier gives symbolic events but no broader full-form map beyond the supplied windows, so proportional judgment remains uncertain. Cadential syntax is inferred from pitches and durations rather than annotated harmonic analysis. Recognition is reported only in the machine-readable field and was not used as evidence.