# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model/provider/settings: unknown. Tools were available in the environment, but no tools or external data were used; analysis was limited to the embedded dossier.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-8JQJ",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {"score": 1, "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: candidate opens on B-D#-F# and then A-C# before D material. Inference: home tonic D is delayed, so tonic stability at the return is weak."},
    "thematic_correspondence": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E015", "E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: opening rhythm and contour return transposed in E015, E016 closely matches E002, and E017 matches E003. Inference: substantial but not exact opening-theme return."},
    "preparation_strength": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E009", "E010", "E011", "E012", "E013", "E014", "E015"], "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate passage includes active chromatic motion and dynamic contrast before E015, but no clear dominant-to-tonic cadence into D. Inference: preparation is mixed."},
    "proportional_location": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E015"], "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs at 72 of 141 quarter notes into the second part. Inference: near the midpoint, compatible with a recapitulatory division."},
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"], "reason": "Observed: forte appears near the candidate after preceding dynamic contrast, with fuller bass sonority at E015. Inference: arrival receives substantial rhetorical emphasis despite off-tonic harmony."},
    "rotational_continuation": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E021", "E022"], "reason": "Observed: E017-E018 recall opening continuation, but E019-E022 move into altered and sequential material. Inference: continuation is mixed between recapitulatory rotation and development."}
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.2,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.65,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.15
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {"level": "none", "confidence": 0.0},
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly suggests a thematic return, but its initial B-major support and delayed D stability make off-tonic recapitulation more likely than tonic double return."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier provides symbolic windows only, not the complete form, labels, or audio realization. Tonal interpretation is uncertain because local function must be inferred from pitch content and limited surrounding measures. Recognition was not used as evidence and is reported only in the JSON field.