# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: GPT-5-based Codex. Provider: OpenAI. Sampling and inference settings: unknown. External data and tools were unavailable under the supplied access boundary and were not used.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5-based Codex",
  "case_id": "CASE-8JQJ",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 0,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: the candidate begins with B–D-sharp–F-sharp, while a D-rooted sonority appears only two measures later. Inference: the home tonic is not structurally stable at the candidate onset."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E002", "E003", "E004", "E015", "E016", "E017", "E018"],
      "reason": "Observed: the candidate reproduces the opening rhythm and contour, then closely or exactly matches several succeeding measures. Inference: this constitutes an extensive return of the opening theme."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: a forte passage subsides to piano before the candidate, but the immediately preceding harmony does not present an unambiguous dominant of its B-major onset. Inference: preparation is rhetorically clear but cadentially mixed."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "reason": "Observed: the candidate occurs after 72 of 141 quarter-note units, approximately 51% through the second part. Inference: this central position is strongly compatible with a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed: the preceding piano dynamic gives way to forte at the candidate, with a renewed sustained bass sonority and returning melodic texture. Inference: the arrival receives substantial rhetorical emphasis."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E023", "E024", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed: several immediate measures track the opening closely, but later material is recomposed and includes exact sequential repetitions. Inference: continuation supports recapitulatory rotation initially but remains equivocal against continued developmental sequencing."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.045,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.95,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.005
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "style",
    "confidence": 0.7
  },
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly restores the opening thematic rotation near the second part's midpoint, but begins on a clear non-tonic B-major sonority; later sequential recomposition introduces limited uncertainty."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier supplies complete symbolic events only for selected windows, not the uninterrupted movement or explicit harmonic labels. Consequently, large-scale tonal function and the relationship of later continuation to omitted exposition material remain uncertain. Dynamics and notation are available, but performance-level accent, timbre, and timing are absent. The main analytical uncertainty is whether the later sequential recomposition belongs to an altered recapitulation or continued development.