# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: GPT-5-based Codex assistant. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools: available in the environment but not used. External data: not used; analysis limited to the embedded dossier.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "GPT-5 Codex",
  "case_id": "CASE-6U43",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017", "E021"],
      "reason": "Observed D-major signature and D-centered opening return, with later D-F#-A support. Inference: tonic is substantially present, though the first candidate bar lacks bass support."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E015", "E004", "E025", "E005", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed E015 exactly matches E001, and E025-E026 match opening material E004-E005. Inference: opening-theme return is strong despite intervening recomposition."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed pre-candidate material emphasizes B/D/F# and a C# trill, then moves directly to D-themed material. Inference: preparation is weak, lacking clear cadential dominant arrival."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed candidate begins 63 quarter notes into a 147-quarter-note second part. Inference: this mid-second-part point is plausible but not strongly diagnostic for recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed no dynamics, articulations, texture expansion, register surge, or barline marker at the candidate. Inference: thematic clarity gives some arrival effect, but rhetorical emphasis is weak."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017", "E021", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed post-candidate continuation develops D-centered material and later resumes opening measures E004-E005. Inference: behavior substantially supports recapitulation, though recomposed and interrupted."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.08,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.12,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.8
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "none",
    "confidence": 0.0
  },
  "case_note": "The candidate strongly recalls the opening on D and continues with recomposed but rotationally related material; weak preparation and limited rhetorical marking reduce certainty."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier provides symbolic events but no score image, audio, phrase labels, or broader form beyond the sampled windows. Dynamics are encoded as complete yet absent here, limiting rhetorical assessment. Harmonic interpretation is uncertain where bass is absent or texture is fragmentary. Recognition did not occur and is not used as evidence.