# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Analyst model: unknown. Provider/settings: unknown. Tools were available in the environment, but no tools, files, internet, or external data were used; analysis used only the embedded dossier.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-Q2R9",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate starts as anacrustic A over rest, then moves to D-supported opening material. Inference: tonic is structurally asserted immediately after pickup, though not on the candidate onset itself."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E016", "E002", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: E016 onset 3 matches the opening pickup in E001, and E017 matches E002. Inference: the opening theme returns with very high identity and extent."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016"],
      "reason": "Observed: preceding material is chromatic and melodic, with no clear dominant pedal, cadence, or strong bass arrival into the candidate. Inference: preparation is weak despite local lead-in motion."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E016"],
      "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs 120 of 408 quarter notes into the second part. Inference: this is possible but somewhat early for a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed: no dynamics, accents, special articulation, or textural expansion mark the candidate; it begins within a measure with sparse texture. Inference: rhetorical emphasis is weak."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 4,
      "evidence_ids": ["E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E021", "E022", "E023", "E024"],
      "reason": "Observed: material after the candidate follows the opening rotation closely across multiple measures. Inference: subsequent behavior strongly supports recapitulation rather than continued development."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.03,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.12,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.85
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "style",
    "confidence": 0.35
  },
  "case_note": "The return is thematically and rotationally very strong, with tonic support arriving after an anacrustic candidate onset; weak preparation and emphasis keep some off-tonic ambiguity."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier supplies symbolic notes, rests, dynamics, and articulations, but no audio, phrase labels, harmonic analysis, or global formal map beyond elapsed/total second-part timing. The main uncertainty is whether the anacrustic candidate onset should be treated as the recapitulatory moment or as pickup to the following tonic arrival.