# Analysis result

## Run metadata

analyst_model: unknown  
provider: unknown  
settings: unknown  
tools_available: no external tools used; embedded dossier only  
external_data_available: no

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-6U43",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017"],
      "reason": "Observed return begins on D in D-major signature, then supplies D/F#/A material. Inference: tonic is substantially projected, though the onset lacks bass/harmonic support."
    },
    "thematic_correspondence": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E015", "E002", "E016"],
      "reason": "Observed E015 matches E001 exactly in melody and rhythm; E016 diverges from E002 after the opening F#. Inference: strong incipit return with partial continuation."
    },
    "preparation_strength": {
      "score": 2,
      "evidence_ids": ["E013", "E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed pre-candidate has F#/C# sonority and trill-like emphasis, then B-centered material before D entry. Inference: some rhetorical setup, but no clear dominant cadence into tonic."
    },
    "proportional_location": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015"],
      "reason": "Observed candidate occurs 63 of 147 quarter-notes into the second part. Inference: this mid-to-late placement is substantially compatible with a recapitulatory division."
    },
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {
      "score": 1,
      "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015"],
      "reason": "Observed candidate has regular barline, no dynamics, articulation, register expansion, or added texture; preceding texture thins. Inference: arrival is recognizable mainly by thematic return, not emphasis."
    },
    "rotational_continuation": {
      "score": 3,
      "evidence_ids": ["E015", "E016", "E017", "E025", "E026"],
      "reason": "Observed continuation alters early opening continuation but later resumes opening-like measures corresponding to E004-E005. Inference: behavior supports a varied rotation rather than mere sequence."
    }
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.12,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.08,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.8
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {
    "level": "none",
    "confidence": 0.0
  },
  "case_note": "Candidate is best read as a tonic double return: exact opening incipit on D with substantial tonic support, despite weak cadential preparation and understated rhetoric."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier supplies symbolic events but no audio, score image, phrase labels, or larger formal map beyond the windows. Tonal and formal judgments are therefore inferred from pitch, rhythm, placement, and local continuation only. The main uncertainty is whether the altered measures after the incipit represent recapitulatory recomposition or continued developmental process.