# Analysis result

## Run metadata

Model/provider/settings: unknown. Tools/external data: no tools used; external data unavailable by instruction.

## Machine-readable result

```json
{
  "schema_version": "2.1.0",
  "analyst_model": "unknown",
  "case_id": "CASE-Q2R9",
  "cues": {
    "tonal_stability": {"score": 3, "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: candidate begins on an A pickup, then E017 gives D with D-F#-A support. Inference: home tonic is delayed by upbeat syntax but substantially stabilized."},
    "thematic_correspondence": {"score": 4, "evidence_ids": ["E001", "E016", "E002", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: E016 from onset 3 matches opening pickup E001, and E017 matches E002. Inference: the opening theme returns with strong identity."},
    "preparation_strength": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E014", "E015", "E016"], "reason": "Observed: pre-candidate uses extended active material and chromatic tones before the pickup, but no explicit cadential dominant is evident. Inference: preparation is rhetorical/motivic, not strongly cadential."},
    "proportional_location": {"score": 2, "evidence_ids": ["E016"], "reason": "Observed: candidate occurs 120 quarters into a 408-quarter second part. Inference: this is early but still plausible for a recapitulatory division, so support is mixed."},
    "rhetorical_emphasis": {"score": 1, "evidence_ids": ["E016", "E017"], "reason": "Observed: no dynamics are marked; candidate begins in single voice after rests, with tonic support only after the pickup. Inference: arrival is understated."},
    "rotational_continuation": {"score": 4, "evidence_ids": ["E017", "E018", "E019", "E020", "E021", "E022", "E023", "E024"], "reason": "Observed: after the pickup, E017-E024 closely track the opening sequence E002-E009. Inference: continuation behaves as recapitulation rather than development."}
  },
  "status_distribution": {
    "not_recapitulation": 0.03,
    "off_tonic_recapitulation": 0.12,
    "tonic_double_return": 0.85
  },
  "suspected_recognition": {"level": "none", "confidence": 0.0},
  "case_note": "The return is thematically and rotationally very strong; tonic support arrives with the main downbeat after a pickup, making tonic double return likeliest despite understated rhetoric."
}
```

## Limitations

The dossier gives symbolic events but no analytical labels, phrase boundaries, or global formal map beyond elapsed duration. Dynamics are mostly absent, limiting rhetorical judgment. Tonal assessment depends on interpreting the candidate pickup and following downbeat as one return gesture, which is analytically plausible but not directly annotated.